Thursday, June 16, 2011

On the Way to National ID

See below summary of the legislation introduced this week. We are clearly on our way towards a national ID system……….

************************************


 


Summary of the "Legal Workforce Act"


 

On June 14, 2011, Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) introduced H.R. 2164, the Legal Workforce Act, which would mandate a new Employment Eligibility Verification System (EEVS) nationwide within 2 years.


 

Who must use EEVS and when must they comply?


 

  1. Mandatory for all employers nationwide in 2-year expedited phase-in. The largest employers must use EEVS within 6 months of enactment. The smallest employers with 1 to19 employees must comply within 2 years. Status quo maintained until the effective dates take effect. Early compliance mandated within 30 days for employers already required to use E-Verify.
  2. Recruiters, referrers and union halls (including union halls that take no fee) are required to use EEVS within 1 year of enactment.


     

  3. Agriculture: Employers using seasonal workers for agriculture or services (as defined in the H-2A program) must use EEVS within 3 years from enactment. Workers from past seasons are not deemed new hires and need not be reverified.


     

    Re-verification: Generally not required but reverification is mandatory for:

  4. All federal, state, and local government employees
  5. All employees with a limited period of work authorization
  6. Employees at certain federal and state contracts working in the U.S.
  7. Employees at certain critical infrastructure sites
  8. Employers can voluntarily choose to reverify their workforce


     

    When must employers verify job applicants? The bill authorizes employers to make offers of employment conditioned upon final clearance by EEVS. By muddying the waters on current law which forbids any kind of pre-screening by employers this will invite employer abuse and discrimination. The bill includes no language prohibiting discriminatory practices.


     

    Safe harbor protections for employers. Broad relief from liability from civil or criminal suit granted to employers for actions taken in good faith reliance on EEVS, unless there is clear and convincing evidence that the employer knew the employee was unauthorized. There is also relief from substantive and technical violations if timely corrected.


     

    Penalty and enforcement mechanisms.


     

  9. Felony crime created with fines and prison time for knowing misuse of a social security number or other identification. Enhanced penalty for aggravated identity theft if committed in connection with this newly created crime.
  10. Ten-fold increase in fines as well as heightened penalties for employers but with a waiver for violators who acted in good faith.


     

    Limited protections for workers. Employee remedy is limited to suit solely under the Federal Tort Claims Act or injunctive relief. Class actions are prohibited. No relief against employers.


     

    Major expansion of SSA's enforcement duties will burden SSA and result in issuance of more compliance letters

  11. Multiple use of SSA numbers. SSA must send notice letters regarding employees who hold more than one job during the year if there is a pattern of unusual multiple use. SSA shall also issue notices to employers submitting one or more mismatched wage and tax statements or corrected wage and tax statements.


     

    Blocks on social security numbers. SSA is authorized to block a social security number if it is used unusually multiple times. SSA is required to block the SS number for noncitizens whose visas have expired and other categories of noncitizens. An individual worker can block the use of his or her number if its use was not authorized.


     

    Preemption. The bill preempts states and localities from passing employment verification laws and policies, but grants states and localities a broad exception to the preemption rule by permitting them to use business licensing laws and similar laws as a penalty for failure to use EEVS. This will invite continued state/local regulation in this area and result in diverse and likely conflicting laws.


     

    Biometric pilot program shall be launched within 18 months of enactment that uses private sector companies that would maintain their own databases and interact with federal databases. Participation in the pilot program is voluntary for employers but mandatory for new employees hired by those employers.


     

    More onerous documentation requirements. The bill eliminates many approved documents showing identity and work authorization.

Thursday, June 9, 2011

Visa Bulletin for July 2011


 

VISA BULLETIN JULY 2011

Family- Sponsored

All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed

CHINA- mainland born

INDIA

MEXICO

PHILIPPINES

F1

01MAY04

01MAY04

01MAY04

08MAR93

15APR96

F2A

22MAR08

22MAR08

22MAR08

15FEB08

22MAR08

F2B

01JUL03

01JUL03

01JUL03

22SEP92

22SEP00

F3

15JUL01

15JUL01

15JUL01

15NOV92

22MAR92

F4

08MAR00

08MAR00

08MAR00

01MAR96

15MAY88


 

Employment-
Based

All Charge-ability Areas Except Those Listed

CHINA- mainland born

INDIA

MEXICO

PHILIPPINES

1st

C

C

C

C

C

2nd

C

08MAR07

08MAR07

C

C

3rd

08OCT05

01JUL04

01MAY02

01JUL05

08OCT05

Other Workers

22NOV04

22APR03

01MAY02

22NOV04

22NOV04

4th

C

C

C

C

C

Certain Religious Workers

C

C

C

C

C

5th
Targeted Employment Areas/ Regional Centers and Pilot Programs

C

C

C

C

C

Thursday, May 26, 2011

AILA Troubled by Supreme Court Decision That Opens Door to 50 Different Laws on Employment Verification

This is likely to create a royal mess………………The US needs reform………..

*************************************************************************************************************

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Thursday, May 26, 2011

CONTACTS:
George Tzamaras
202-507-7649
gtzamaras@aila.org

Jenny Werwa
202-507-7628
jwerwa@aila.org

WASHINGTON, DC -- The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) is troubled by today's Supreme Court decision to uphold the Arizona Legal Workers Act, a law that threatens to revoke the business licenses of companies in that state if they knowingly hire unauthorized immigrants and requires that Arizona businesses participate in the federal E-Verify program which Congress enacted as a voluntary "pilot program." AILA agrees with Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who said that the majority reading of the law "subjects employers to a patchwork of enforcement schemes similar to the one that Congress sought to displace when it enacted IRCA."

The decision did not address Arizona's infamous SB 1070, the more high-profile Arizona immigration law which requires police to check the immigration status of individuals in certain circumstances. The main provisions of SB 1070 were successfully challenged in federal court on constitutional grounds and are on appeal.

According to David Leopold, President of AILA, "Today's Supreme Court decision is no predictor of how the Court will come out on SB1070. The majority opinion appears to have turned on a narrow and technical reading of the 'savings clause' in IRCA that references state licensing laws. Those who might take some comfort from this decision, hoping that other state laws such as Arizona SB 1070 might be upheld, should pay close attention to the court's affirmation that state laws violate the Constitution if 'they impose additional burdens on the Federal government.'"

Leopold added, "What is particularly troubling about this decision is the danger of a muddled mix of state immigration laws, each of which claims to essentially track the federal law, but each of which has its own tweaks and nuances. It will be extremely burdensome and expensive for employers who operate in multiple states across the country, and who wish, in good faith, to comply with our immigration laws, to ensure not only federal compliance but also compliance on a state-by-state level."

###

The American Immigration Lawyers Association is the national association of immigration lawyers established to promote justice, advocate for fair and reasonable immigration law and policy, advance the quality of immigration and nationality law and practice, and enhance the professional development of its members.


 

Friday, May 13, 2011

USCIS Launches I-9 Web Site

On May 13, 2011, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) today launched I-9 Central, a new online resource center dedicated to the most frequently accessed form on USCIS.gov: Form I-9, Employee Eligibility Verification.

This free, easy-to-use website builds on recent employment-related enhancements by providing employers and employees simple one-click access to resources, tips and guidance to properly complete Form I-9 and better understand the Form I-9 process.

Read the Press Release.

Thursday, May 12, 2011

June 2011 Visa Bulletin

Visa Bulletin For June 2011


 

Family-
Sponsored

All Chargeability
Areas Except
Those Listed

CHINA-
mainland born

INDIA

MEXICO

PHILIPPINES

F1

01MAY04

01MAY04

01MAY04

01MAR93

22FEB96

F2A

22AUG07

22AUG07

22AUG07

22JUL07 

22AUG07

F2B

15APR03

15APR03

15APR03

22AUG92

08JUN00

F3

01JUN01

01JUN01

01JUN01

15NOV92

08MAR92

F4

08MAR00

08MAR00

08MAR00

15FEB96

01MAY88


 

Employment-
Based

All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed

CHINA-
mainland born

INDIA

MEXICO

PHILIPPINES

1st

C

C

C

C

C

2nd

C

15OCT06

15OCT06

C

C

3rd

15SEP05

15MAY04

22APR02

22DEC04

15SEP05

Other Workers

08NOV03

22APR03

22APR02

08NOV03

08NOV03

4th

C

C

C

C

C

Certain Religious Workers

C

C

C

C

C

5th
Targeted Employment Areas/ Regional Centers and Pilot Programs

C

C

C

C

C

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

DREAM Act Reintroduced

WASHINGTON, DC – On May 11, 2011, Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) and 32 cosponsors introduced the DREAM Act, legislation that, if passed, would provide undocumented youth who were brought to the U.S. as children a path to citizenship if they attend college for two years or enlist in the military.  Representatives Howard Berman (D-CA) and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) also will introduce similar legislation in the House of Representatives today. This legislation, which has been introduced in every congressional session since 2001, has received widespread support from the business, labor, education, and faith sectors, and enjoys high public approval ratings.  Below is a statement from Marielena Hincapié, executive director of the National Immigration Law Center:

"Senator Durbin, Representative Berman, Representative Ros-Lehtinen, and the other members of Congress who cosponsored this legislation recognize that passing this bill cannot come quickly enough for the young men and women — and children — whom it affects.  Every day, talented young people are caught in the immigration enforcement dragnet and deported.  That's why, a few weeks ago, several senators also sent a letter to President Obama urging him to use his executive authority to make deferred action available on a more systematic basis to DREAM-eligible individuals, and thus to provide these Americans-at-heart a more reliable means of avoiding being deported from the only country they know.

"Last year, after a thrilling win in the House of Representatives, the DREAM Act, like so much other commonsense legislation that had been proposed, fell victim to partisan politics.  The loss wasn't felt only by the children affected by this legislation; it was felt by the entire Latino community, who watched the vote as it was broadcast live by the country's two largest Spanish-language television networks.

"Yesterday, during a major address on immigration, President Obama reaffirmed his support for this much-needed legislation.  Unfortunately, the Department of Homeland Security continues to deport young DREAMers, even though they may be mere months away from having the opportunity to normalize their immigration status. While our greatest hope is that the DREAM Act becomes law, until then, we call on President Obama to use prosecutorial discretion to grant relief to these students. We cannot continue to lose these vital members of our communities. Our economy and society are suffering because of inaction."

Friday, May 6, 2011

USCIS Launches E-Verify Spanish Website

USCIS has launched the Spanish version of its E-Verify web pages. Please visit www.uscis.gov/espanol/E-Verify
to view important information for both employees and employers now available in Spanish. USCIS plans to expand the E-Verify Spanish website with additional sections on a recurring basis.


 

USCIS ha lanzado la versión en español de sus páginas web de E-Verify. Por favor, visite www.uscis.gov/espanol/E-Verify
para ver información importante tanto para empleadores como empleados, ahora disponible en español. USCIS planea expandir el sitio web en español de E-Verify añadiendo secciones regularmente.